05/01/2018

Create One Class: Designing a College Career Course Across Career Developmental Stages and Interests

By Rebecca Dordel

From Individual Counseling to the Classroom
Beginning counselors may find teaching career courses challenging due to the limited opportunities in course development (specifically related to customizing the experience to individual students’ needs). Often, courses are categorized by a student’s year in school, which can be problematic given that one’s place in their career journey may not always align with their academic progress. Additional issues can arise when, in an attempt to address a wide range of career interests, the curriculum becomes overbearing or too broad. Well-intended efforts to meet everyone where they are can result in students finding courses to be irrelevant or not timely in their career planning process.

 

Beginning counselors may be particularly discouraged by negative student evaluations and question their competency as an educator in a classroom setting. To alleviate some of the challenges, I redesigned a career course within the College of Biological Sciences (CBS) at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. My goal was to create a curriculum that was accessible and relevant to students who were at different places along their career development path, in addition to students who had a wide range of career goals. Beginning counselors may want to implement this model when starting out as instructors.

 

The Track Team Model
Four career development categories were identified as necessary components of a new career course offering: (a) self-assessment, (b) career exploration, (c) internship or entry-level job search, and (d) the graduate school application process. To accomplish this task, a curriculum concept emerged- labeled as “track teams.” Under the track team model, students engage in the same curriculum, but each student selected one of four tracks which determined the major career development assignments they completed independently, outside of class. The track team concept encouraged students to take ownership over their career planning by allowing them to select tasks they see as most relevant to their current career concerns.

The four possible tracks were:

Self- Exploration: Explore skills, interests, and decision-making style while learning about careers in the biological sciences.

Career Basics: Learn the fundamentals of how to find opportunities and prepare application materials for future experiences of interest.

Organizing the Process: Internships or Entry Level Employment: Focus on career planning skills and prepare application materials for internships or entry-level positions.

Organizing the Process: Graduate or Professional School: Engage in organizing the application process and prepare application materials for graduate or professional school.

 

Challenging Classroom Assumptions
When future counselors transition from the one-on-one counseling environment to the classroom, they may struggle to balance the role of empowering students to cultivate their own knowledge with an expectation from students that the instructor is the primary disseminator of information. To challenge this perceived dynamic, an individual’s track selection is used to place them within a smaller working-group where students navigate various career topics together. By creating track teams based on current career development needs rather than major or year in school, students are more likely to encounter information and resources that are new and germane to their career concerns. Students regularly offer curriculum insights, or share meaningful extra-curricular experiences with classmates which fosters positive networking experiences among students and alleviates the perceived pressure on instructors to be the primary source of knowledge.

 

Curriculum and Assessment
The Biology 2001 curriculum is designed to resemble a weekly workshop with a strong foundation in student development theory. Undergraduates are introduced to John Krumboltz’s Theory of Planned Happenstance and regularly hear about upcoming opportunities that may serve as their own “Moment of Planned Happenstance”. This is another intentional course component to challenge students to take ownership over the career exploration process.

Participants also take tailored pretest and posttest assessments based on their track selection to assess the specific skills or knowledge attainment associated with each track. At the end, each student is provided their assessment results and asked to complete a reflection piece. This activity asks them to identify concrete examples of how they have built career knowledge and topics where they would like to continue their development.  The use of the reflection purposefully encourages the student to take an active role in recognizing areas for growth and appropriate next steps in their career development process.

 

Student Reception and Recommendations
Since the Fall of 2015, 87 students have taken Biology 2001. Feedback demonstrates that allowing students to customize the classroom and homework experience creates a higher likelihood that students see the immediate relevancy of the course to their career planning needs. One student stated, "Excellent class. I wish I could take this class continuously just to keep working on the skills here and keep myself thinking about my professional future."

Counselor Educators who support beginning counselors who waiver in their enthusiasm or confidence in a classroom setting, may want to challenge the assumption that a lack of teaching skills is to blame for others' dissatisfaction and may instead encourage critical assessment of course design.

 


Rebecca DordelRebecca Dordel is a Career Coach in the College of Biological Sciences at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Previously, she was the Assistant Director of Health and Law Professions Advising at the University of Virginia. For more information about Biology 2001: Career Planning for Biologists, contact her at dordel@umn.edu.

 

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version

7 Comments

Rich Feller on Tuesday 05/01/2018 at 09:52PM wrote:

Rebecca what a nice article helping to honor individual differences...I will incorporate the track team model in an NSF project where we use modules like www.youscience.com, The Who You are Matters game, mentors, LinkedIn, group work, ets. many thanks rich

Kathyy Battee-Freeman on Wednesday 05/02/2018 at 09:35AM wrote:

Hi Rebecca,
I attended your roundtable at the 2017 NCDA conference and was inspired. Although I still haven't implemented my version, it's great to see your article and get a reminder to get going the goals I set after the 2017 conference. Thanks for sharing your experience and inspiring me to do a different kind of class here on our campus.

Marlena Yang on Wednesday 05/02/2018 at 10:16AM wrote:

Great read! It was a privilege to have Rebecca as my mentor this spring semester. As a new professional in career services while also teaching career courses for the first time, I often found it challenging to tailor my curriculum to meet my students' needs. Rebecca offered practical insight that was very helpful for me to infuse in my transfer student career course. The curriculum Rebecca developed truly aims to meeting students where they are in the career process. Thank you for sharing and being an inspiration!

Chris Magnuson on Wednesday 05/02/2018 at 01:54PM wrote:

Thanks Rebecca, your article certainly supported my belief that the more we connect education with work, the better off we are!

Abby Trout on Wednesday 05/02/2018 at 03:56PM wrote:

Great job, Rebecca! Thank you for sharing your work!

Naniek K. Darmawan on Friday 05/18/2018 at 01:20AM wrote:

hi Rebeca ....
I just want to know if your track model could be used on my high school students throughing their career ? thanks

Paul Timmins on Friday 05/18/2018 at 09:20PM wrote:

I'm really impressed by your student-centered approach, Rebecca. I'm looking forward to your presentation on career courses during the NCDA conference in Phoenix!

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the comments shown above are those of the individual comment authors and do not reflect the opinions of this organization.